Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

<Suggestion: Expand beyond Qt-AES> #59

Open
njardim opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

<Suggestion: Expand beyond Qt-AES> #59

njardim opened this issue Aug 26, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@njardim
Copy link

njardim commented Aug 26, 2023

Hey,

Qt-AES is almost perfect and very easy to use and integrate, which makes it standout from the competition, so in this light can you expand beyond Qt-AES, and create similar encryption classes for the other four AES finalists?

My suggestion is first to expand and create:

Qt-MARS
Qt-RC6
Qt-Serpent
Qt-Twofish

And maybe, (as a hashing function) who knows:

Qt-Whirlpool

Let me know what do you think.

@bricke
Copy link
Owner

bricke commented Sep 12, 2023

It's an interesting proposal, I would do it in their own repo instead of having Qt-Aes deal with them

@njardim
Copy link
Author

njardim commented Oct 13, 2023

It's already been almost two months since my first suggestion, so it's fair to say that I'm kind of wondering how is this going? Do we have a prototype already? :)

This will be a great accomplishment since there isn't anything like this for Qt as easy to implement as Qt-AES.

After creating the other four candidates' repositories you'll have something special and really powerful.

And the Qt community will thank you for it for a very long time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants