Why is the default storage orientation first_order for tensors? #174
Unanswered
TimLauwers
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
No. Not really. You can design fast and efficient matrix or tensor algorithms for any kind of linear storage format. Currently all tensor algorithms are sequential and not optimized. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
For matrices, the default is row-major order as I would expect with C(++) programming. However, in the documentation of tensors it is said that first_order corresponds to column-major order for matrices. Are there any performance improvements that first_order brings that I'm not aware of?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions