You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The SSSOM format uses CURIEs exclusively, so there won't be any confusion about identifier style ambiguity
We can use SSSOM tooling instead of implementing it ourselves or alternatively contribute our tooling back to the SSSOM community
There would be fewer artifacts that need to get built, and the messaging in Biomappings could be a bit more straightforwards
A few drawbacks:
Requires more programming churn
Have to assess how downstream dependencies consume Biomappings
Note: we're still allowed to choose our own prefix map with our SSSOM files, so we don't necessarily have to consider conflicts in nomenclature with the OBO community, but it would probably be a good idea to consider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are a few benefits:
A few drawbacks:
Note: we're still allowed to choose our own prefix map with our SSSOM files, so we don't necessarily have to consider conflicts in nomenclature with the OBO community, but it would probably be a good idea to consider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: