You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, you are in principle right (in 2D) yet it is unclear whether the speed improvement with such a 1/8 scheme would outweight the memory consistency and caching advantages of the quadrant scheme, but you are more than welcome to try this out.
For the copying of the last (outermost) dimension a 1D adressing scheme is (optionally) used, as this is a bit faster than the ND copy operation.
I think in principle it is enough to calculate 1/8 of the array, not only one quadrant, right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: