You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at https://bids.neuroimaging.io/bep031 there seems to be no mentioning of "precomputed" file format heavily used by various groups for EM data and supported by a wide range of software (neuroglancer, cloudvolune, tensorstore , webKnossos, etc). It might have been much of a "community standard" but has been established and used for many years with some features which are only coming to Zarr these days (e.g. sharding). Moreover there are (I was told) TBs (if not PBs) of data already in that format so it seems that we might be missing an opportunity to provide support for something which is widely used and cannot be "easily" or "cheaply" converted to another (e.g. Zarr) format.
Your idea
Looking at https://bids.neuroimaging.io/bep031 there seems to be no mentioning of "precomputed" file format heavily used by various groups for EM data and supported by a wide range of software (neuroglancer, cloudvolune, tensorstore , webKnossos, etc). It might have been much of a "community standard" but has been established and used for many years with some features which are only coming to Zarr these days (e.g. sharding). Moreover there are (I was told) TBs (if not PBs) of data already in that format so it seems that we might be missing an opportunity to provide support for something which is widely used and cannot be "easily" or "cheaply" converted to another (e.g. Zarr) format.
attn @bids-standard/bep031 - does anyone recall precomputed being discussed/dismissed as an option and why? After all we already support not just Zarr but also other formats (from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modality-specific-files/microscopy.html#file-formats):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: