Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Managing NIfTI intent fields #15

Closed
oesteban opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Managing NIfTI intent fields #15

oesteban opened this issue Sep 18, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@oesteban
Copy link
Collaborator

Comes from #5 (comment)

@arokem
Copy link
Collaborator

arokem commented Nov 28, 2022

To clarify: there is a nii-compliant way to write out DTI-specific derivatives. But many software libraries don't implement anything to deal with this compliant way of doing things, instead just doing... whatever.

Do we want to support the nii-compliant way of doing things? As the only way of doing things? Or one of a couple of options? This might intersect with #34 in the sense that this could be the role of some software that takes output of different processing pipelines and puts them in that format.

@Lestropie
Copy link
Collaborator

My personal preference would be to not interpret the NIfTI intent fields at all. BIDS metadata via JSON should completely supersede such things, as its capabilities will be a superset. Relevance moreso to #23 is that if a piece of software is known to read / write those intend fields, then any conversion to/from BIDS Derivatives should handle such appropriately.

@arokem
Copy link
Collaborator

arokem commented Nov 29, 2022

Makes sense. Closing.

@arokem arokem closed this as completed Nov 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants