-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Managing NIfTI intent fields #15
Comments
To clarify: there is a nii-compliant way to write out DTI-specific derivatives. But many software libraries don't implement anything to deal with this compliant way of doing things, instead just doing... whatever. Do we want to support the nii-compliant way of doing things? As the only way of doing things? Or one of a couple of options? This might intersect with #34 in the sense that this could be the role of some software that takes output of different processing pipelines and puts them in that format. |
My personal preference would be to not interpret the NIfTI intent fields at all. BIDS metadata via JSON should completely supersede such things, as its capabilities will be a superset. Relevance moreso to #23 is that if a piece of software is known to read / write those intend fields, then any conversion to/from BIDS Derivatives should handle such appropriately. |
Makes sense. Closing. |
Comes from #5 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: