diff --git a/proportionality.qmd b/proportionality.qmd index 4342e9c..0b420c7 100644 --- a/proportionality.qmd +++ b/proportionality.qmd @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +--- +format: + html: + css: aqua_style.css + html-table-processing: none +--- + ::: {.callout-important} This version of the AQuA book is a preliminary ALPHA draft. It is still in development, and we are still working to ensure that it meets user needs. @@ -52,7 +59,7 @@ To guide what assurance is needed it is necessary to take a structured approach This can be visualised by considering the situation as a risk matrix, illustrated in Figure 2. The impact of the analysis will usually be beyond the control of the analyst to change, so there will be few options to move an assessment down the table. However, there will usually be treatments (or mitigations), involving additional assurance measures, that will allow the assessed business risk to move to the left. - +
@@ -70,47 +77,47 @@ This can be visualised by considering the situation as a risk matrix, illustrate - - - - - + + + + + - - - - - + + + + + - - - - - + + + + + - - - - - + + + + + - - - - - + + + + +
Critical Medium Medium High High High Medium Medium High High High
Severe Low Medium Medium High High Low Medium Medium High High
Major Low Medium Medium Medium High Low Medium Medium Medium High
Moderate Very Low Low Medium Medium Medium Very Low Low Medium Medium Medium
Minor Very Low Very Low Low Low Medium Very Low Very Low Low Low Medium