Don't conflate evidence for a diff (BF) with "meaningful" differences

[benwhalley]

At the end of this video: https://benwhalley.github.io/lifesavR/session-5.html#bayest
I say a very large BF is overwhelming evidence and that the diff is "likely to be meaningful"... this is obviously wrong and we would be better to use this as a point to distinguish evidence against a null hypothesis being different from a meaningful effect size (in practical terms).

[benwhalley]

note - this is in the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gefYqIPIjJQ