Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modify evm listener server #67

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2023
Merged

Conversation

robertcc0410
Copy link

Closes: #45

Description


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer

For admin use:

  • Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. WIP, R4R, docs, etc)
  • Reviewers assigned
  • Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2023 05:37
@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 reopened this Dec 4, 2023
@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2023 06:06
@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 reopened this Dec 8, 2023
@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2023 03:38
@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 marked this pull request as draft December 13, 2023 03:44
@robertcc0410 robertcc0410 marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2023 07:20
@0x677261706562616261 0x677261706562616261 merged commit 0aa1c96 into b2network:main Dec 13, 2023
47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

l2->l1 bridge
2 participants