You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Creating a new resource requires a lot: an active internet connection, a working server, a resolvable Agent. It would be nice if Resources can be created and update local-first.
Additionally, it would be nice if resources could be resolved without a server. A P2P solution, perhaps something that uses content-addressing (e.g. something like ipfs / iroh) would be swell.
Potential solution
User can create a Commit that does not refer to an HTTP subject. It has no target. It's a RootCommit (not sure about the name).
The signature of that commit is the identifier. (or perhaps the iroh hash?)
This RootCommit has a date, a publicKey (linking
You can refer to the initial version of this resource using a did:atomic:RootHash. So we'll introduce a new did:atomic schema for this.
You can refer to a specific following version of this resource using using a did:atomic:CommitHash
API
Not a lot would change for the user. When creating a resource, the subject becomes optional. The resource that is returned will get a subject through its constructor, by taking the hash of that resource.
Questions
Should the identifier of the resource be based on the signature of the first resource? Or should it be the hash? For compatibility with something like ipfs, a hash would be nice. But Atomic uses signatures of the agent.
For authorship, the public key (or subject?) of the signing agent should be included in that initial resource.
Problem
Creating a new resource requires a lot: an active internet connection, a working server, a resolvable Agent. It would be nice if Resources can be created and update local-first.
Additionally, it would be nice if resources could be resolved without a server. A P2P solution, perhaps something that uses content-addressing (e.g. something like ipfs / iroh) would be swell.
Potential solution
target
. It's aRootCommit
(not sure about the name).iroh
hash?)RootCommit
has adate
, apublicKey
(linkingdid:atomic:RootHash
. So we'll introduce a newdid:atomic
schema for this.did:atomic:CommitHash
API
Not a lot would change for the user. When creating a resource, the
subject
becomes optional. The resource that is returned will get a subject through its constructor, by taking the hash of that resource.Questions
Relevant issues
Relevant reads
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: