Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include fuse2 for AppImages to work #2713

Open
joewood9364 opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Include fuse2 for AppImages to work #2713

joewood9364 opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@joewood9364
Copy link

describe the request

Include fuse2 by default for appimages to work out of the box. This would be a simple change which opens the default install to work with many apps seamlessly.

@svartkanin
Copy link
Collaborator

Can't that be achieved by adding it to the additional packages?

@joewood9364
Copy link
Author

Yeah but so can anything. archinstall aims to provide a minimal functional experience out of the box. If 1 package is preventing an entire platform of apps from running I would say its important to include it.

@Torxed
Copy link
Member

Torxed commented Oct 3, 2024

I know it sounds rough, but a minimal functioning experience is not appimages on Arch Linux. Appimages are user-opt-in versions of applications, the default usage in Arch is packages via pacman.

If a user opts in to use appimages however, they are more than welcome to of course, but then they also have to add fuse2. Most people won't ever need fuse2 for a functioning system.

@joewood9364
Copy link
Author

I appreciate the commitment to minimalism. However, to scrutinize how this minimalism is being assessed: VLC and a broken Discover are included by default in the KDE profile, which likely wouldn’t be considered minimal in the Arch world. With this broad interpretation, I think including a small, non-visible background library might be reasonable without it being considered bloat.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants