Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question] Training models without VAE #26

Closed
vijpandaturtle opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

[question] Training models without VAE #26

vijpandaturtle opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists question Further information is requested

Comments

@vijpandaturtle
Copy link

vijpandaturtle commented Apr 2, 2020

Hi, does your codebase offer training of the models without VAE ? Thanks

@vijpandaturtle vijpandaturtle changed the title Training models without VAE [ques] Training models without VAE Apr 2, 2020
@vijpandaturtle vijpandaturtle changed the title Training models without VAE [question] Training models without VAE Apr 2, 2020
@araffin araffin added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists question Further information is requested labels Apr 16, 2020
@araffin
Copy link
Owner

araffin commented Apr 16, 2020

Duplicate of #25

It is possible but not recommended.

@araffin araffin closed this as completed Apr 16, 2020
@Adnan-annan
Copy link

@araffin training without VAE is not recommended, can you specifically mention because of what reasons ? because it will take more time to train ?

@araffin
Copy link
Owner

araffin commented Jan 5, 2021

because it will take more time to train ?

yes, especially when using SAC, both in term of number of timesteps and wall time.
There are different links in the article that explain why decoupling feature extraction from policy learning may be a good thing ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants