Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-49615] Bugfix: Make ML column schema validation conforms with spark config spark.sql.caseSensitive. #48398

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

WeichenXu123
Copy link
Contributor

@WeichenXu123 WeichenXu123 commented Oct 9, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Bugfix: Make ML column schema validation conforms with spark config spark.sql.caseSensitive.

Why are the changes needed?

Bugfix: Make ML column schema validation conforms with spark config spark.sql.caseSensitive.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

N/A

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

N/A

Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
@WeichenXu123 WeichenXu123 marked this pull request as draft October 9, 2024 14:21
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
@WeichenXu123 WeichenXu123 marked this pull request as ready for review October 10, 2024 03:50
@WeichenXu123 WeichenXu123 changed the title [SPARK-49615] Make spark ML dataset column selection conforming with spark.sql.caseSensitive config [SPARK-49615] Bugfix: Make ML column schema validation conforms with spark config spark.sql.caseSensitive. Oct 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weichen Xu <[email protected]>
@WeichenXu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

merged to master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants