Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-2926: Fix issue reading buggy parquet files with incorrect compressed size #2927

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pyckle
Copy link

@pyckle pyckle commented Jun 23, 2024

Make sure you have checked all steps below.

Jira

Tests

  • My PR adds the following unit tests OR does not need testing for this extremely good reason:
    Unit test with malformed file is added

Commits

  • My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines
    from "How to write a good git commit message":
    1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
    2. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
    3. Subject does not end with a period
    4. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
    5. Body wraps at 72 characters
    6. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"

Style

  • My contribution adheres to the code style guidelines and Spotless passes.
    • To apply the necessary changes, run mvn spotless:apply -Pvector-plugins

Documentation

  • In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it.
    • All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain Javadoc that explain what it does

@wgtmac wgtmac changed the title #2926 Fix issue reading buggy parquet files with incorrect compressed size GH-2926: Fix issue reading buggy parquet files with incorrect compressed size Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typically parquet files are checked into the parquet-testing repo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants