Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Improvement] the format of gravitino server configuration is broken #610

Closed
FANNG1 opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #611
Closed

[Improvement] the format of gravitino server configuration is broken #610

FANNG1 opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #611
Labels
improvement Improvements on everything

Comments

@FANNG1
Copy link
Contributor

FANNG1 commented Oct 26, 2023

What would you like to be improved?

fix the table format

How should we improve?

No response

@FANNG1 FANNG1 added the improvement Improvements on everything label Oct 26, 2023
jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
… table in markdown (#611)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix the format of gravitino server configuration to table in markdown

### Why are the changes needed?
table format is broken by #579 


Fix: #610 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no

### How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
… table in markdown (#611)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix the format of gravitino server configuration to table in markdown

### Why are the changes needed?
table format is broken by #579 


Fix: #610 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no

### How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
… table in markdown (#611)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

fix the format of gravitino server configuration to table in markdown

### Why are the changes needed?
table format is broken by #579 


Fix: #610 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no

### How was this patch tested?
existing UTs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvements on everything
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant