[ISSUE #4174]Support to subscribe message by tags when using RocketMQ storage plugin.

[pandaapo]

Fixes #4174.

Motivation

Support to subscribe tcp message by tags when using RocketMQ storage plugin.

Modifications

Add api based on RocketMQ message tag related api to implement subscribing tcp message by tags when using RocketMQ storage plugin.

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
• If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
• If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 80 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (378aa75) 17.62% compared to head (6152f52) 17.59%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ache/eventmesh/client/tcp/common/MessageUtils.java	11.76%	15 Missing ⚠️
...nt/tcp/impl/cloudevent/CloudEventTCPSubClient.java	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...eventmeshmessage/EventMeshMessageTCPSubClient.java	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...he/eventmesh/common/protocol/SubscriptionItem.java	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
.../protocol/tcp/client/group/ClientGroupWrapper.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...ntmesh/storage/rocketmq/producer/ProducerImpl.java	45.45%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...pache/eventmesh/client/tcp/EventMeshTCPClient.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...he/eventmesh/client/tcp/EventMeshTCPSubClient.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...pl/eventmeshmessage/EventMeshMessageTCPClient.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...entmesh/runtime/core/plugin/MQConsumerWrapper.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4175      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.62%   17.59%   -0.03%     
- Complexity     1784     1785       +1     
============================================
  Files           805      807       +2     
  Lines         29924    29985      +61     
  Branches       2580     2584       +4     
============================================
+ Hits           5273     5276       +3     
- Misses        24169    24227      +58     
  Partials        482      482              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[qqeasonchen]

any update?

[pandaapo]

any update?

There are no more updates for now.

[pandaapo]

PR description in Chinese

[Title] 当使用RocketMQ storage插件时，支持按照标签订阅消息。

Motivation

当使用RocketMQ storage插件时，支持按照标签订阅消息（tcp）。

Modifications

增加基于RocketMQ消息标签相关的api的接口，从而实现当用户使用RocketMQ storage插件时，可以按照标签订阅消息（tcp）。

[xwm1992]

@pandaapo please solve the conflicts.

[pandaapo]

@pandaapo please solve the conflicts.

Conflicts fixed.

[github-actions]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 8.04598% with 80 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 17.59%. Comparing base (378aa75) to head (6152f52).
Report is 201 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ache/eventmesh/client/tcp/common/MessageUtils.java	11.76%	15 Missing ⚠️
...nt/tcp/impl/cloudevent/CloudEventTCPSubClient.java	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...eventmeshmessage/EventMeshMessageTCPSubClient.java	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...he/eventmesh/common/protocol/SubscriptionItem.java	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
.../protocol/tcp/client/group/ClientGroupWrapper.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...ntmesh/storage/rocketmq/producer/ProducerImpl.java	45.45%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...pache/eventmesh/client/tcp/EventMeshTCPClient.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...he/eventmesh/client/tcp/EventMeshTCPSubClient.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...pl/eventmeshmessage/EventMeshMessageTCPClient.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...entmesh/runtime/core/plugin/MQConsumerWrapper.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4175      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.62%   17.59%   -0.03%     
- Complexity     1784     1785       +1     
============================================
  Files           805      807       +2     
  Lines         29924    29985      +61     
  Branches       2580     2584       +4     
============================================
+ Hits           5273     5276       +3     
- Misses        24169    24227      +58     
  Partials        482      482              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Pil0tXia]

It seems that this PR could have been merged.

[github-actions]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

[github-actions]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.

[github-actions]

It has been 60 days since the last activity on this pull request. I am reaching out here to gently remind you that the Apache EventMesh community values every pull request, and please feel free to get in touch with the reviewers at any time. They are available to assist you in advancing the progress of your pull request and offering the latest feedback.

If you encounter any challenges during development, seeking support within the community is encouraged. We sincerely appreciate your contributions to Apache EventMesh.