Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[branch-2-0](http) add show_table_data http api #28633

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 25, 2023

Conversation

nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor

@nextdreamblue nextdreamblue commented Dec 19, 2023

In some cases, users need to get the data size of single replica of a table, and evaluate certain actions based on this, such as estimating the precise backup size.

Proposed changes

Issue Number: close #xxx

cherry pick from #28380

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@github-actions github-actions bot added the kind/docs Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Dec 19, 2023
@nextdreamblue nextdreamblue changed the title [improvement](http) add show_table_data http api (#28380) [branch-2.0](http) add show_table_data http api Dec 19, 2023
@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@nextdreamblue nextdreamblue changed the title [branch-2.0](http) add show_table_data http api [branch-2-0](http) add show_table_data http api Dec 19, 2023
In some cases, users need to get the data size of single replica of a table, and evaluate certain actions based on this, such as estimating the precise backup size.

Signed-off-by: nextdreamblue <[email protected]>
@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Member

@xy720 xy720 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Dec 19, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run p0

@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run clickbench

@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 50.83 seconds
stream load tsv: 568 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 125 MB/s
stream load json: 20 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 112 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 32 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 25 MB/s
insert into select: 29.8 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 335K ops/s
storage size: 17162516388 Bytes

@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

1 similar comment
@nextdreamblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 50.35 seconds
stream load tsv: 571 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 124 MB/s
stream load json: 20 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 112 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 32 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 25 MB/s
insert into select: 29.8 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 335K ops/s
storage size: 17162829441 Bytes

Copy link
Contributor

@Yulei-Yang Yulei-Yang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lide-reed lide-reed merged commit 4e3aefb into apache:branch-2.0 Dec 25, 2023
24 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. kind/docs Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants