Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-41531: [MATLAB][Packaging] Bump matlab-actions/setup-matlab and matlab-actions/run-command from v1 to v2 in the crossbow job #41532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

sgilmore10
Copy link
Member

@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 commented May 3, 2024

Rationale for this change

I noticed dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml is still using matlab-actions/setup-matlab@v1, which is no longer supported. See this log file. We should use matlab-actions/setup-matlab@v2 instead. We should also use matlab-actions/run-command@v2 instead of matlab-actions/run-command@v1.

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Replaced matlab-actions/setup-matlab@v1 with matlab-actions/setup-matlab@v2 in dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml

  2. Replaced matlab-actions/run-command@v1 with matlab-actions/run-command@v2 in dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml

Are these changes tested?

N/A (I will trigger a crossbow job to verify the packaging workflow works as expected still).

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

…atlab@v2

2. Replace matlab-actions/run-command@v1 with matlab-actions/run-command@v2
@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting review Awaiting review label May 3, 2024
@sgilmore10
Copy link
Member Author

@github-actions crossbow submit matlab

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2024

Revision: 8099250

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-04e9a1c267

Task Status
matlab GitHub Actions

Copy link
Member

@kou kou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels May 3, 2024
@sgilmore10
Copy link
Member Author

+1

@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 merged commit e7f5f81 into apache:main May 3, 2024
7 checks passed
@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 deleted the GH-41531 branch May 3, 2024 18:46
@sgilmore10 sgilmore10 removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label May 3, 2024
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit e7f5f81.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

vibhatha pushed a commit to vibhatha/arrow that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
…` and `matlab-actions/run-command` from `v1` to `v2` in the `crossbow` job (apache#41532)

### Rationale for this change

I noticed `dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml` is still using `matlab-actions/setup-matlab@ v1`, which is no longer supported. See this [log](https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/8928507510/job/24524230971#step:4:11) file. We should use `matlab-actions/setup-matlab@ v2` instead. We should also use `matlab-actions/run-command@ v2` instead of `matlab-actions/run-command@ v1`.

### What changes are included in this PR?

1. Replaced `matlab-actions/setup-matlab@ v1` with `matlab-actions/setup-matlab@ v2` in `dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml`

2. Replaced `matlab-actions/run-command@ v1` with `matlab-actions/run-command@ v2` in `dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml`

### Are these changes tested?

N/A (I will trigger a crossbow job to verify the packaging workflow works as expected still). 

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

* GitHub Issue: apache#41531

Authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants