Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 17, 2024 #37504

Closed
17 of 33 tasks
eladkal opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed
17 of 33 tasks

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 17, 2024 #37504

eladkal opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Feb 17, 2024

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 8.18.0rc2

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 8.0.0rc2

Provider common.sql: 1.11.0rc3

All users involved in the PRs:
@ellisms @potiuk @vincbeck @rawwar @MaksYermak @Don-Burns @Lee-W @kacpermuda @Taragolis @dacort @vchiapaikeo @romsharon98 @hussein-awala @ferruzzi @raphaelauv @dirrao @pankajastro @dabla @VladaZakharova

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Feb 17, 2024
@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Feb 17, 2024

I marked all items that were tested in RC1 #37358 as tested here too but feel free to retest them.

airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-providers that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
@vchiapaikeo
Copy link
Contributor

vchiapaikeo commented Feb 17, 2024

Thanks so much @eladkal, @potiuk, and @pankajastro for getting this fixed and prepped so quickly. #37300 still looks good.

I found a subtle bug with the trigger_reentry refactor, but I don't think it should block the release by any means. It was just a bit confusing at first. Sorry for missing this in testing earlier! I put out a PR for it here: #37508

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Feb 18, 2024

Tested both providers with our example DAGs without encountering an error. Verified #36330

@dacort
Copy link
Contributor

dacort commented Feb 18, 2024

Confirmed #34225

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 18, 2024

Checked #37359 -> all good.

@Taragolis
Copy link
Contributor

Checked: #37138

@Don-Burns
Copy link
Contributor

Checked: #37150: Working as intended.

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Feb 18, 2024

provider cncf.kubernetes will be excluded from this release due to bug found

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Feb 18, 2024

Thank you everyone. Providers are released.
cncf.kubernetes is excluded and RC3 will follow shortly.

I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants