Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop generateconfig-anyconf and generateconfig-processing after usage #76

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

hellodword
Copy link
Contributor


  • I understand that contributing to this repository will require me to agree with the CLA

Description

small changes

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • 🍕 Feature
  • 🐛 Bug Fix
  • 📝 Documentation Update
  • 🎨 Style
  • 🧑‍💻 Code Refactor
  • 🔥 Performance Improvements
  • ✅ Test
  • 🤖 Build
  • 🔁 CI

Related Tickets & Documents

Mobile & Desktop Screenshots/Recordings

Added tests?

  • 👍 yes
  • 🙅 no, because they aren't needed
  • 🙋 no, because I need help

Added to documentation?

  • 📜 README.md
  • 📓 tech-docs
  • 🙅 no documentation needed

[optional] Are there any post-deployment tasks we need to perform?

@fb929
Copy link
Collaborator

fb929 commented Jun 28, 2024

this is required for the correct startup sequence

@hellodword
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/05-services/#long-syntax-1

service_completed_successfully: Specifies that a dependency is expected to run to successful completion before starting a dependent service.

I think this does not change the startup sequence

@fb929
Copy link
Collaborator

fb929 commented Jun 28, 2024

https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/05-services/#long-syntax-1

service_completed_successfully: Specifies that a dependency is expected to run to successful completion before starting a dependent service.

I think this does not change the startup sequence

https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/05-services/#long-syntax-1

service_completed_successfully: Specifies that a dependency is expected to run to successful completion before starting a dependent service.

I think this does not change the startup sequence

ok, we will check

@fb929 fb929 merged commit 06959f1 into anyproto:main Aug 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 14, 2024
@hellodword hellodword deleted the patch-2 branch August 20, 2024 00:07
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants