You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We don't have a bag type. There are plenty of 3P bag/multiset types available, but I don't have a particular one in mind. Either way, we need it so that we have proper equality since the order of the constraints is unimportant.
If open content was modeled separately from the constraints, we could use a set instead of a bag since two completely identical constraints are redundant and functionally equivalent to having only one of them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
popematt
changed the title
Add bag type for cstoring constraints and type arguments
Add bag type for storing constraints and type arguments
Aug 23, 2023
If open content was modeled separately from the constraints, we could use a set instead of a bag since two completely identical constraints are redundant and functionally equivalent to having only one of them.
Originally posted by @popematt in #191 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: