Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Instead of underperforming it is written outperforming in 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb #151

Open
appyzdl opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@appyzdl
Copy link

appyzdl commented Jul 28, 2024

Describe the bug
Ok so this typo I found while reading 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb
In the markdown cell after cell number Out[44] we can see it is written: "The linear SVM is far outperformed by the other classifiers. However, let's keep it for now since it may improve the voting classifier's performance."

But as we can see the score for LinearSVC is the least i.e. 0.8662.

Expected behavior
Instead we can write: "The Linear SVM is actually the worst-performing model among the four, with a score of 0.8662, which is lower than the other three models. Instead Extra Trees is the best-performing model among the four, with a score of 0.9743."

Screenshots
Here we can see it is written Linear SVM is far outperformed instead it should be underperformed.
image

Versions (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [MacOSX 14.5]
  • Python: [3.11.9]
@appyzdl appyzdl changed the title Instead of underperforming it is written outperforming in 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb [BUG] Instead of underperforming it is written outperforming in 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb Jul 28, 2024
@appyzdl
Copy link
Author

appyzdl commented Jul 28, 2024

I have created the PR for the following bug I created, if any more details are needed please comment. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant