Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can we use parsy for more rigid validation in the backend? #17

Open
thesethtruth opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Can we use parsy for more rigid validation in the backend? #17

thesethtruth opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@thesethtruth
Labels
research

Comments

@thesethtruth
Copy link
Collaborator

https://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/python-type-hints-parsy-case-study/

https://github.com/python-parsy/parsy
@thesethtruth thesethtruth self-assigned this Dec 8, 2022
@thesethtruth
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Might be completely redundant if the pydantic BaseModel is able to parse json and objects by default using parse_raw() or parse_obj().

@thesethtruth thesethtruth mentioned this issue Dec 9, 2022
Open
30 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@thesethtruth thesethtruth

Labels
research
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@thesethtruth