You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I am confused of the pathogenicity annotation of splice_site mutation.
In two articles recently published in NEJM, one classified splice variants affecting penultimate and the last exon as VUS or B/LB, and the other only keep splice sites (+/- 1 or 2). I dont know if InterVar also annotates the splice variants in a similar way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 10:38 PM Caijin Lin ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, I am confused of the pathogenicity annotation of splice_site mutation.
In two articles recently published in NEJM, one classified splice variants
affecting penultimate and the last exon as VUS or B/LB, and the other only
keep splice sites (+/- 1 or 2). I dont know if InterVar also annotates the
splice variants in a similar way.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#66>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNG3OAHJICRZQMLPH6I52TTXJITVANCNFSM5AF5W74Q>
.
Hi, I am confused of the pathogenicity annotation of splice_site mutation.
In two articles recently published in NEJM, one classified splice variants affecting penultimate and the last exon as VUS or B/LB, and the other only keep splice sites (+/- 1 or 2). I dont know if InterVar also annotates the splice variants in a similar way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: