Specifications maintained as a JupyterBook

[jesusff]

Hi,

now that the final archiving specs are out and the repositories under the CORDEX GitHub organization could be explored more thoroughly in search for authoritative information, we should consider updating the contents of this "archive-specifications" repository to match the actual specs.

I assume this repo was initially thought to have the specs nicely displayed as a JupyterBook (e.g. https://wcrp-cordex.github.io/archive-specifications/attributes.html), but the information is currently not up to date. This can be quite confusing for people landing in this repository.

As a quick fix, we could replace the contents of the default branch in this repo by a README pointing to the actual archiving specs, while we (decide whether to) update the JupyterBook sources.

[larsbuntemeyer]

Yes, good point. I'll have to fix this (or probably take it offline) to avoid conflicts! I have some time on (innovation) friday to go through some CORDEX issues...

[jesusff]

For the moment, I have deactivated the GitHub Pages in this repo and removed the jupyterbook sources from the main branch (f620c11). They are under the jupyterbook branch. I leave this issue open as a reminder that this work is here, ready to have future specs maintained as traceable markdown sources.

I close other related issues (#3, #8) related to the Jupyterbook, even though they will need to be addressed at some point when this work is retaken.

[larsbuntemeyer]

Thanks for cleaning this!