Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this project still under development? #18

Closed
officer-rosmarino opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 22 comments
Closed

Is this project still under development? #18

officer-rosmarino opened this issue Dec 11, 2017 · 22 comments

Comments

@officer-rosmarino
Copy link

It looks like this project could be a very good addition to objection.js, and I am willing to try it and use it.

However, I am wondering whether it still is under development.

Is it still alive?

@igor-savin-ht
Copy link
Contributor

Seeing that last committ was in October, and from third-party PR, I'd say that it is sorta-kinda alive, but not under very active development.

@kapouer
Copy link
Collaborator

kapouer commented Jan 8, 2018

This project is not under development. I'm not using it anymore.
I'm willing to somewhat continue to support it as far as i can, as a way to say thank you to @koskimas for his work. So just SHOUT if you think something must be merged and i will LOOK at it.

Leaving this issue open so that anyone can see it first.

@igor-savin-ht
Copy link
Contributor

@kapouer Any chance you could provide maintainer permissions to someone from community to make the project more future-proof in case you decide to eventually move on?

@kapouer
Copy link
Collaborator

kapouer commented Jan 8, 2018

Well i'm precisely in this situation right now. Anyone else can ask the project owner (not summoning him a second time) and i think he will gladly grant that.

@kibertoad
Copy link
Collaborator

@koskimas I've been thinking of rewriting test infrastructure of the project to something more modern and we intend to use this library heavily in our project; any chance I could be considered for a co-maintainer at some point? If there is any formal PR review process or something else that I would have to follow - I would be happy to comply.

@kapouer
Copy link
Collaborator

kapouer commented Jan 8, 2018

@kibertoad it would be easier if we could identify you as @igor-savin-ht...

@igor-savin-ht
Copy link
Contributor

@kapouer "igor-savin-ht" is my corporate account; if I ever change place of employment, having project maintainership linked to it in GitHub would break things :).

@kapouer
Copy link
Collaborator

kapouer commented Jan 8, 2018

ok so you acknowledge kibertoad is your personal account ? (sorry but being explicit is a bit required here...)

@igor-savin-ht
Copy link
Contributor

@kapouer Yes, kibertoad is my personal account.

@koskimas
Copy link
Collaborator

@kapouer I gave you admin rights for this repository. I give you full control over the future of this project.

I haven't personally contributed to this in ages, and I thought you would know better who could be the next maintainer(s).

@igor-savin-ht
Copy link
Contributor

@kapouer Any updates :)?

@kapouer
Copy link
Collaborator

kapouer commented Jan 17, 2018

@kibertoad you have write access to the repository, and i'll give you publish access (if i can !) to the npm package in release+1 if you don't mind me being careful ;)

@igor-savin-ht
Copy link
Contributor

@kapouer Awesome, thanks! What would be the best channel to reach out to you to discuss new features and refinements?

@kapouer
Copy link
Collaborator

kapouer commented Jan 17, 2018

here, in new issues ? or if really informal, by email is fine.

@kibertoad
Copy link
Collaborator

I presume we can close this issue now?..

@orditeck
Copy link

orditeck commented Nov 1, 2018

So, is this projet still under development? 😊

@kibertoad
Copy link
Collaborator

@orditeck Well, I am still committed to supporting it whenever needed and added some features our team missed, so sorta-kinda; I don't have a specific roadmap of things still missing, but if you have anything on your mind - please let me know, if it's reasonable, I'll do my very best to make it happen.

@orditeck
Copy link

orditeck commented Nov 1, 2018

Ok thanks, I just wanted to confirm whether the project was still maintained or not. This issue could be closed then IMO!

@DeanMauro
Copy link
Collaborator

@kibertoad Are you open to having another maintainer on the project? My team uses objection-find in production and we've been adding improvements in a fork up to this point, but would be happy to contribute for the community.

Finished updates:

Future updates:

  • Typescript support
  • Configurable limits on nested relations (i.e. only allow filtering 3 levels deep)

@kibertoad
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeanMauro Considering that I don't have much time to dedicate to this project lately, would be grateful to get any help. Invite sent, and thank you!

@kibertoad
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeanMauro We probably should move from circleci to GitHub Actions and docker-compose based DB support, looks like CI was broken for a while.

@DeanMauro
Copy link
Collaborator

@kibertoad thank you!

Agreed on the ci. I'll take a peek. Let's see if we can get it back in working order through GA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants