Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MIT license vs voglperf code license #33

Open
thorstenhirsch opened this issue Sep 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

MIT license vs voglperf code license #33

thorstenhirsch opened this issue Sep 5, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@thorstenhirsch
Copy link

I don't understand your licensing. Your README says the code is under the MIT license, but in your license file you call it "VOGLPERF CODE LICENSE". The body of the LICENSE seems to be a copy of the MIT license, but everybody has to check it word-by-word now since you gave it a different name. Also in the header it says "All Rights Reserved", which is not compatible to the MIT license, so that statement doesn't make any sense.

If this should have been the MIT license, please just use the MIT license (https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/) and replace "[year] [fullname]", but nothing else.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant