You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note: this enhancement is to be built on top of the dev branch as the feature is not available in master branch currently. It is part of OMRChecker v2
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We now support outputting evaluation summary on the marked bubble images(reference).
But currently it is limited to separate field labels, and ignores the customLabels provided in the template.json. One common use for customLabels is the two-digit integer type question, where we can show both marked bubbles as green if the multi-column answer was correct.
Describe the solution you'd like
Need to find a way to visually display the correct/incorrect verdicts without an ambiguity in case of the customLabels where multiple fields are concatenated before running evaluation.
Should document all possible cases of verdicts when using custom labels
Add a test sample containing these different cases (you can also reuse any existing sample that contains customLabels)
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
Here's the todo comment corresponding to above enhancement
# linked_custom_labels = [custom_label if (field_label in field_labels) else None for (custom_label, field_labels) in template.custom_labels.items()]# is_part_of_custom_label = len(linked_custom_labels) > 0# TODO: replicate verdict: question_has_verdict = len([if field_label in questions_meta else None for field_label in linked_custom_labels])
Note: please share your queries and approaches on discord for quicker discussions:
Note: this enhancement is to be built on top of the dev branch as the feature is not available in master branch currently. It is part of OMRChecker v2
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We now support outputting evaluation summary on the marked bubble images(reference).
But currently it is limited to separate field labels, and ignores the
customLabels
provided in the template.json. One common use for customLabels is the two-digit integer type question, where we can show both marked bubbles as green if the multi-column answer was correct.Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
Here's the todo comment corresponding to above enhancement
Note: please share your queries and approaches on discord for quicker discussions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: