Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Helium issue #57

Open
Esouder opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Helium issue #57

Esouder opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Investigation Research into a topic or possible feature

Comments

@Esouder
Copy link
Member

Esouder commented Sep 8, 2022

So it turns out the IMU is apparently sensitive to helium, which we use as a pressurant and maybe RCS propellant? In any case we will need to figure out what the deal is with this. We've made a little bit of noise about this to the rest of the team, so far, but nothing major.

  1. What's the effect of helium on the device? Permanent disablement, something temporary, wonky readings?
  2. What can we do about it?
@Esouder Esouder self-assigned this Sep 8, 2022
@Esouder Esouder added Investigation Research into a topic or possible feature and removed question labels Sep 10, 2022
@Esouder
Copy link
Member Author

Esouder commented Sep 11, 2022

Had a brief chat with Dr. Mattison about this issue. He had a couple insights:

  1. The IMU has some sort of internal seal that keeps the correct atmosphere inside of it (for MEMS reasons?), but it's not a perfect seal and helium can slowly diffuse through
  2. Helium isn't likely to permanently break the IMU, but it might mess up the calibration and possibly make the device stop sending data if things go too far outside the range it's expecting. Most of the helium that might get in should be able to diffuse out by letting it sit for a few weeks.
  3. We should be safe from helium as long as we're not venting or leaking helium directly into where the IMU is stored. Conformal coating or anything isn't super useful, as it probably isn't any better of a seal than what's inside the IMU already. It's more a matter of being careful, but Dr. Mattison suggests that just being 'around' the area of the rocket while we're, for instance, venting helium during an abort should be manageable.

Also in a suggestion from him, and something that we'd been thinking about for a little bit is that we don't really have a backup for the IMU. (or the GPS for that matter). I'm going to break this out into a separate issue.

@Esouder Esouder mentioned this issue Sep 11, 2022
@misprit7
Copy link
Contributor

Obviously only one was planned for communication and it probably doesn't make sense to send both up, but just an FYI.

@UBC-Rocket UBC-Rocket deleted a comment from misprit7 Sep 11, 2022
@Esouder
Copy link
Member Author

Esouder commented Sep 11, 2022

Deleted a comment, it had Pablo's personal phone and address on it. It was an invoice that showed that we actually have two IMUs and we don't really need a backup in that case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Investigation Research into a topic or possible feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants