Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Network List should List subnet and address range if admin #77

Open
Smithx10 opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Network List should List subnet and address range if admin #77

Smithx10 opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Smithx10
Copy link

Smithx10 commented Mar 26, 2021

arch@9d46dd2d-1178-ce83-cbc4-d396e4a24060 ~ ❯❯❯ triton networks -l
ID                                    NAME               SUBNET            GATEWAY        FABRIC  VLAN  PUBLIC
7a7d3510-c834-431d-9cf7-8e7219f3bb9a  My-Fabric-Network  192.168.128.0/22  192.168.128.1  true    2     false
d86b63bb-3d8b-4abf-94e9-9cad37d190d1  cloudops_dmz_0     -                 -              -       -     true
37a1cc60-ced2-4e59-a62f-1d40525dc8b8  cps_lan            -                 -              -       -     true
0eca2659-28cb-42af-bc45-0b5e4aa134cc  dev01              192.168.20.0/24   192.168.20.1   true    200   false
a14a8828-33ff-4546-96b2-649a7f78ad6f  dev02              192.168.21.0/24   192.168.21.1   true    201   false
68c9cd97-de9f-4108-9fcf-a9ae1dd7840b  sdc_nat            -                 -              -       -     true
6b6f4454-990e-4d19-a071-464e13487aa5  test123            10.20.30.0/24     -              true    2     false
a79485ce-4821-4731-978e-cb0d49df0e54  test4              10.20.31.0/24     -              true    2     false

I'm an admin on cps_lan, and users should know which address range they can provision.

@Smithx10 Smithx10 changed the title Network List should List IP if owner Network List should List subnet and address range if admin Mar 26, 2021
@danmcd
Copy link
Contributor

danmcd commented Apr 30, 2021

Please note your testing here. I'm assuming with the change in #80 in place you have better output than what's shown above?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants