Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
We don't test with hammer. How large is the design and how long did it hang? Can you try turning off -routability_driven and -timing_driven if you are using them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Matt,
Do you have any idea what is blocking now? regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You'll need to ask the hammer team how to construct a test case from hammer. You might consider using OpenROAD-flow-scripts in which case I could offer more help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
I am following https://chipyard.readthedocs.io/en/stable/VLSI/Sky130-OpenROAD-Tutorial.html to understand the VLSI flow. The link above mentions about openroad versions (also other tools) which were seem to be working (or were working at some time).
My environment is ubuntu 22.04 on Intel Xeon server with 32 cores and over 92GB RAM.
It is not possible to install openroad version
OpenROAD v2.0-7070-g0264023b6
using conda. So i proceeded to build and install the same githash. I have usedcmake -DENABLE_VTUNE=OFF ..
as the 2024.2 vtune (latest) from intel seems to be incompatible in terms of libraries available.The build went fine and i started with the synthesis and par.
During par, the system hung (32 core Xeon) at step
``[par] [Exec ...l/bin/openroad -no_init -log /...] [NesterovSolve] Iter: 360 overflow: 0.283068 HPWL: 1126055571
Here are my changes in the configuration.
I proceeded to try changing the par parameters, but it has become more sluggish. The -j20 argument doesn't seem to have any effect too.
I contacted chipyard mailing list, but the suggestion is to contact openroad developers !!
https://groups.google.com/g/chipyard/c/bH4Nx6cY9Sw
Do you guys know what is going on with my trials? Is there a working BKM for trying sky130 + openroad in chipyard/hammer context?
regards
Arun
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions