You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This plugin doesn't inherit from BufferedOutput so the typical fluentd configuration options around tuning buffers are not available (e.g,. memory vs file, flush interval, etc)
Is this intentional? It seems like it would be easier to use if it was consistent with other buffered output plugins, using the standard <buffer> type config
I noticed this when converting from the Splunk output plugin to this output plugin, and specifically seeing that the flush interval was much higher, without an apparent way to tune it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've been using fluentd for years for log collection, processing and buffering/aggregation across hundreds of ephemeral docker hosts. We also have some custom plugins for log filtering and processing. Fluentd has been great for us and this plugin also was an easy integration to output logs to Sumo.
This plugin seems to work fine, but was just interested in whether it could be improved via the BufferedOutput alignment, allowing for more tuning as needed.
This plugin doesn't inherit from
BufferedOutput
so the typical fluentd configuration options around tuning buffers are not available (e.g,. memory vs file, flush interval, etc)Is this intentional? It seems like it would be easier to use if it was consistent with other buffered output plugins, using the standard
<buffer>
type configI noticed this when converting from the Splunk output plugin to this output plugin, and specifically seeing that the flush interval was much higher, without an apparent way to tune it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: