Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PolyOpt only accept functions without any extra inputs #728

Closed
prbzrg opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

PolyOpt only accept functions without any extra inputs #728

prbzrg opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@prbzrg
Copy link
Member

prbzrg commented Mar 28, 2024

As docs suggest for mini-batch, the loss function can be (u, p, xs_) -> vl and it works with OptimizationOptimisers but this line in OptimizationPolyalgorithms creates errors. Does using PolyOpt have an intended restriction on the loss function?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Oh that just needs to splat the args

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 31, 2024
@Vaibhavdixit02
Copy link
Member

We have moved in the other direction, no solver accepts arbitrary arguments anymore so this won't be fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants