You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
if there is interest, I'm willing to prototype these algorithms in RigidBodyDynamics.jl, or start a new project altogether. im really just trying to get started with robotics simulations for kicks. my background is in writing fluid dynamics solvers. thanks in advance for your guidance.
That has nothing to do with this repo, so I don't know why this paper is posted here. But it's quite obviously a silly paper: Jacobian reuse schemes are the standard way to improve the performance of implicit integrators and they aren't even mentioned here. Simple handwritten implicit Euler is routinely around 2-3 orders of magnitude slower then well optimized higher order integration techniques with proper reuse schemes. Why was their baseline something nobody would ever use? Any paper that doesn't use something like Sundials CVODES or ARKODE as the baseline and instead uses simple implementations of first order methods should be an immediate red flag.
hi all, I'm new to robotics and was wondering if anybody has thoughts on Position Based Dynamics methods: https://matthias-research.github.io/pages/publications/smallsteps.pdf. They seem to be able to account for constraints in a seemingly straightforward way.
if there is interest, I'm willing to prototype these algorithms in RigidBodyDynamics.jl, or start a new project altogether. im really just trying to get started with robotics simulations for kicks. my background is in writing fluid dynamics solvers. thanks in advance for your guidance.
ref JuliaRobotics/RigidBodyDynamics.jl#627
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: