Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pyJac doesn't account for explicitly specified reaction orders #36

Open
2 tasks
skyreflectedinmirrors opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

pyJac doesn't account for explicitly specified reaction orders #36

skyreflectedinmirrors opened this issue Feb 4, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@skyreflectedinmirrors
Copy link
Collaborator

skyreflectedinmirrors commented Feb 4, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Currently the mechanism interpreter simply ignores any explicitly specified reaction order.

Todo:

  • Throw an exception on parsing a non-stoichiometric reaction order mechanism as a stop-gap
  • Go through the derivations and see if we can reasonably implement this behaviour.
@skyreflectedinmirrors skyreflectedinmirrors changed the title pyJac doesn't account for non-stoichiometric reaction orders pyJac doesn't account for explicitly specified reaction orders Feb 4, 2019
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@skyreflectedinmirrors