Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the content of consent form is hard-coded in the sign component #319

Open
yibeichan opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

the content of consent form is hard-coded in the sign component #319

yibeichan opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@yibeichan
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @satra,
I tried to add a consent sign in the demo project for the reproschema paper but then noticed that the content in sign in UI was hard-coded as follows:

<object data="/static/images/Step1.svg" type="image/svg+xml"></object>
<div>I will use the mPower app to answer questions and do short physical and cognitive
activities. The app will help me track my symptoms, triggers, and medications.</div>
</div>

so the consent form will always look like http://www.repronim.org/reproschema-demo/#/activities/0

do you know why it is designed this way? Shouldn't it be that sign is only a function/interface that allows a participant to sign their name and then click "agree/disagree" and the content of the consent form can be defined separately in each research protocol (in the current case, our demo activity here https://github.com/ReproNim/reproschema-demo/tree/main/activities/consent)

@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented Dec 12, 2023

yes, that's how it should be. however, i think we stopped working on it because we could not use it for consent. mit requested that we use docusign or redcap.

@yibeichan
Copy link
Contributor Author

make sense; but wouldn't it be better if we update it since we want researchers beyond MIT to use it? It's always better to have the option of (not) using something than to have no option? If yes, then I can work on it.

@satra
Copy link
Contributor

satra commented Dec 12, 2023

sure, but i would prioritize all the other things before this one.

@yibeichan
Copy link
Contributor Author

sounds good; l'll finish all other things first

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants