You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I modified a file to use a BERT model for the conv_model on the redial dataset, and I obtained a dist@k score > 1 (this result is more higher than the scores reported in the papers below, which raises some doubts). Is this normal? It seems that the range values for dist@k, similar to bleu@k, should both fall within the [0,1] range. When I compared it with other papers, the dist@k for the redial dataset mostly seemed to fall within the [0,1] range. Since I don't have a clear understanding of the dist@k code, could someone help me with this?
I modified a file to use a BERT model for the conv_model on the redial dataset, and I obtained a dist@k score > 1 (this result is more higher than the scores reported in the papers below, which raises some doubts). Is this normal? It seems that the range values for dist@k, similar to bleu@k, should both fall within the [0,1] range. When I compared it with other papers, the dist@k for the redial dataset mostly seemed to fall within the [0,1] range. Since I don't have a clear understanding of the dist@k code, could someone help me with this?
My results:
Paper: (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.04032.pdf), (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.09363.pdf)
Bert Model:
Dist@k score: I add a hyp_token = hyp.split()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: