You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should change certain wording of text on the website just to make things a bit clearer for users, especially since it is very similar to polymc's website at the moment. I wanted to get some feedback on some proposed ideas before opening a pull request as I am new to this project.
One example is that in the overview, we should mention not to contact polymc for issues regarding prism as well as multimc.
for example, these are the changes I would make, using brackets to show new stuff added
Please do not contact the [Polymc or] MultiMC team regarding issues related Prism Launcher.
I also think we should make some changes to the about section, mentioning that we were forked from polymc, not multimc (extremely nitpicky, but It just makes more sense in my mind) and personally I think we should rewrite the section after "While originally being forked over packaging/redistribution concerns" due to the recent incident and just mention that we allow full redistribution and forking as long as it respects the license.
here is an idea I had:
Prism Launcher is a custom launcher for Minecraft that was forked from MultiMC. It allows the creation, and management of multiple installations of the game, or "instances" rather, each having their own separate mods, resource packs, settings, and more. You are also allowed to fork, redistribute, and repackage the launcher freely as long as you follow the GPL v3 license.
This is just an example, and I wanted to get some feedback as I am new to this project. If you want I can open a pull request with some changes if this seems like it's ok, I just didn't want to open one immediately before consulting the developers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we should change certain wording of text on the website just to make things a bit clearer for users, especially since it is very similar to polymc's website at the moment. I wanted to get some feedback on some proposed ideas before opening a pull request as I am new to this project.
One example is that in the overview, we should mention not to contact polymc for issues regarding prism as well as multimc.
for example, these are the changes I would make, using brackets to show new stuff added
Please do not contact the [Polymc or] MultiMC team regarding issues related Prism Launcher.
I also think we should make some changes to the about section, mentioning that we were forked from polymc, not multimc (extremely nitpicky, but It just makes more sense in my mind) and personally I think we should rewrite the section after "While originally being forked over packaging/redistribution concerns" due to the recent incident and just mention that we allow full redistribution and forking as long as it respects the license.
here is an idea I had:
Prism Launcher is a custom launcher for Minecraft that was forked from MultiMC. It allows the creation, and management of multiple installations of the game, or "instances" rather, each having their own separate mods, resource packs, settings, and more. You are also allowed to fork, redistribute, and repackage the launcher freely as long as you follow the GPL v3 license.
This is just an example, and I wanted to get some feedback as I am new to this project. If you want I can open a pull request with some changes if this seems like it's ok, I just didn't want to open one immediately before consulting the developers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: