Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update Tango.md #8

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update Tango.md #8

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Tango.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ This method is as secure as the current PIVX security/reward system and the addi

### Improvements and comments

It does not give voting power to non-stakers and non-masternodes like a balance-based system would, but at the time same this method does further incentivize staking with voting rewards.  This would therefore exclude users who only utilize mobile or SPV wallets.[1]   However, balance-based voting does have some weaknesses like spam/DOS attacks and privacy concerns.
It does not give voting power to non-stakers and non-masternodes like a balance-based system would, but at the same time this method does further incentivize staking with voting rewards.  This would therefore exclude users who only utilize mobile or SPV wallets.[1]   However, balance-based voting does have some weaknesses like spam/DOS attacks and privacy concerns.


Since voting tickets would be issued right up until the superblock, it doesn’t make sense to force users to vote at the last minute in case they earned another ticket right before the deadline.  There are a few ways around this, so the only concern is picking the best one.  For example, early voting could be allowed where the user could state their voting intentions at any point during the voting cycle and any future voting tickets before the super block are automatically applied according to the votes they indicated.  We could also adjust the ticket collection cycle so it doesn’t align exactly with the superblocks.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ The exchange issue is a valid concern and difficult to manage without hindering



Created with direct help and input from:
Written by @turtleflax with direct help and input from:

derek_hansen @derekcloud

Expand Down