Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make software and licence information associated with packs easier to find #51

Closed
EdmundPlayer opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@EdmundPlayer
Copy link

Some users of Arm devices are interested in knowing what open source software and software licences are associated with device family packs. In some ST packs, for example, we typically ship a nice license.md (Markdown) file that lists all of the software in a table and what type of licence is associated with it, e.g., Keil.STM32F4xx_DFP.2.15.0.pack from https://www.keil.com/dd2/. However, for other packs, we don't seem to have such info available. According to the pack tutorial page (https://arm-software.github.io/CMSIS_5/Pack/html/cp_PackTutorial.html) there's an option to create a license file that will be shown during the installation of the Pack, but it's not mandatory. I'm opening this issue to discuss whether providing such information should be 'recommended' or 'mandatory' instead of 'optional' before a device vendor publishes a pack. This could help end users (working with a device) to more easily find information about the software involved, without having to potentially have to scan through all the sources manually themselves. Is this something anyone has considered looking into before?

@0Grit
Copy link

0Grit commented Nov 23, 2021

Recommend converting the issue to a discussion?

@EdmundPlayer
Copy link
Author

EdmundPlayer commented Nov 23, 2021

Good idea, I'd not realised this was an option. Discussion 53 is now logged in the system: #53. I guess we can continue with this issue or not depending on the results of any discussions.

@ReinhardKeil ReinhardKeil added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 30, 2024
@ReinhardKeil
Copy link
Collaborator

This is now addressed by licenses: in the build information files. However missing is:

  • documentation in CMSIS-Toolbox
  • packchk that should issue a warning when no license information is present.

@jkrech
Copy link
Member

jkrech commented Jan 30, 2024

@jkrech jkrech closed this as completed Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants