Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On Mozilla version 27 edit log doesn't pre-populate #18

Open
berryma4 opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

On Mozilla version 27 edit log doesn't pre-populate #18

berryma4 opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@berryma4
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dejande
Copy link
Contributor

dejande commented Feb 14, 2014

So when you click on an edit, olog goes to the modifx_log.html but it doesn't populate input fields? All of them?

I can't repeat this error. Which OS did you use?

Can you send me the URL when this happens. It should look something like http://localhost:8383/Olog/modify_log.html?id=3600_1.

Thanks

@berryma4
Copy link
Member Author

I can only reproduce this on one machine in our cryo control room. I'll have the computer group look at their end. Strange. Thank you!

@berryma4
Copy link
Member Author

I found the issue. Mozilla cached the old modify_log page (Chrome seems more aggressive at grabbing from the serer) . So, the main page was refreshed, such that the user got the new 0.4 version number in the upper left corner, but the modify_log page was still referencing the old cached version.

I guess we have a choice on to handle this or not. Two parts; because the main page is rarely refreshed and left open for long periods, have a javascript version that refreshes the main page. The second part could be to version javascript files to force browsers to reload the cached version of the javascript files.

@dejande
Copy link
Contributor

dejande commented Feb 24, 2014

Definitely this problem should be addressed. There are a couple of interesting solutions for this. I'll try recommended ones and implement the best one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants