You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should the OEDVersion field in all four OED input files be a 'required' field?
Reasons for change
Currently an optional field but making it 'Required' ensures a solid reference to the version of OED. Its' been discussed as a possibility and so I'm just putting it out there for the community to comment and get some feedback.
Scope of change
Location File
Accounts File
Reinsurance Scope
Reinsurance Info
Impact of change
This will be a breaking change for most validation exercises so it will go into OED v4.0.0 which is a major update.
Data type, default values, are blanks allowed, list valid values
Field Name
Data type
Default values
Blanks allowed
Valid values
Acc; Loc; ReinsInfo; ReinsScope
Varcher(10)
Latest version of OED
No
4.0.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Further discussions suggest this should remain an 'optional' field as it will cause too much disruption to make it 'required' and it's not ideal to have this for every row of data in all four files. There was an idea to include this in the model settings file instead.
Description
Should the OEDVersion field in all four OED input files be a 'required' field?
Reasons for change
Currently an optional field but making it 'Required' ensures a solid reference to the version of OED. Its' been discussed as a possibility and so I'm just putting it out there for the community to comment and get some feedback.
Scope of change
Impact of change
This will be a breaking change for most validation exercises so it will go into OED v4.0.0 which is a major update.
Data type, default values, are blanks allowed, list valid values
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: