I don't have enough time until_after_source #2677
Unanswered
leSemaleon
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
yes… and certainly trying that is much easier than writing a new question about it… so maybe I don’t understand your actual question? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
Ok, I'll try to explain again. I know that if we write number after "until_after_source" this will be an additional addition of time. But i want to use condition stop_when_fields_decayed after source and some more time |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Do you know, why this happens? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I want to calculate the transmission spectrum. I use the stop_when_fields_decayed function. With my simulation size, the field from the gaussiansource does not have time to reach the point at which I check the byDecay before the source stops emitting. This causes the simulation to end prematurely. It is possible to add a constant term to until_after_source?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions