You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should extend the parser (for Perfume only) to separate the ordering and
metric logic.
Previously, TIME capture groups were used for metrics that also included
ordering information (like time does), so log lines were reordered into a
monotonically-increasing order. Currently, log lines are never reordered:
line-based ordering is always used.
We should allow users to specify ordering via TIME groups (which may become
more sensible if they are renamed ORDER groups) and independently specify
metrics in new groups (e.g., IMETRIC, DMETRIC, FMETRIC). Going forward, here is
how Perfume should respond when users do or don't specify different group types:
If no order group and no metric group:
-- fail (we don't have a way to identify metric)
If order group and no metric group:
-- use order group for both the ordering and for metric
If no order group but have a metric group:
-- use line-based ordering and metric group for metric (this is currently the
only option in Perfume)
If both order group and metric group:
-- use order group for ordering and metric group for metric
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 13 Aug 2014 at 3:54
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 13 Aug 2014 at 3:54The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: