-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide support for executing OpaqueBehaviors #11
Comments
assuming this is done as part of SVN merge |
is there a test for this? |
I just added this one, after I closed the previously existing one on supporting Alf bodies in opaque behaviors. The test for that is in the Alf Reference Implementation, since the implementation is actually there (but it required some of the XMI loader revisions to work). From: Scott Cinnamond <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> assuming this is done as part of SVN merge Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/11#issuecomment-69465273. |
No, this shouldn't be closed. I just created it. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 10, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Scott Cinnamond <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/11#event-216997592. |
OpaqueBehaviors are not part of the fUML subset, because they cannot have any standard semantics within fUML. However, it would still be useful to have a way to link the implementations of other languages into the fUML Reference Implementation, so that OpaqueBehaviors (and perhaps OpaqueExpressions and OpaqueActions) with bodies in these languages could be executed by calling out to the linked implementations. This should allow execution of bodies in standard UML-related languages such as OCL and Alf, but should not be limited to these.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: