Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ImageMagick_jll dependancies causing issues #58

Closed
alex-s-gardner opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

ImageMagick_jll dependancies causing issues #58

alex-s-gardner opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@alex-s-gardner
Copy link
Contributor

I updated packages and Tyler.jl broke due to this issue: JuliaIO/ImageMagick.jl#209

To fix the issue I had to explicitly add:

add [email protected]

removing ImageMagick dependency in the future in favor of ImageIO would probably be a good idea as it looks like there are plans to deprecate ImageMagick_jll
@felixcremer
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe a stopgap solution until we switch to ImageIO would be to add ImageMagick_jll as an explicit dependency and to add a compat entry to exclude non working versions.

@lazarusA lazarusA mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2023
Merged
felixcremer added a commit to felixcremer/Tyler.jl that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
@felixcremer
Explicitly restrict ImageMagick_jll
40d2391 
Restrict ImageMagick_jll to 6.9.12.
Fixes ImageMagick_jll dependancies causing issues MakieOrg#58
lazarusA pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
@felixcremer
Upgrade to Extents 0.1.2 (#63)
9b50c4f 
* Upgrade to Extents 0.1.2

* Explicitly restrict ImageMagick_jll

Restrict ImageMagick_jll to 6.9.12.
Fixes ImageMagick_jll dependancies causing issues #58

* Actually restrict ImageMagick_jll
@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

Tyler is now using ImageIO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@felixcremer @asinghvi17 @alex-s-gardner