Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TERM REQUEST] DISGENET Evidence Index #105

Open
jmillanacosta opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[TERM REQUEST] DISGENET Evidence Index #105

jmillanacosta opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@jmillanacosta
Copy link

Defined in: https://disgenet.com/About#metrics

subClassOf: ratio

Definition:
The "Evidence index" (EI) indicates the existence of contradictory results in publications supporting the gene/variant-disease associations. This index is computed for associations supported by text mining, and by PsyGeNET, by identifying the publications reporting a negative finding on a particular VDA or GDA. Note that only in the case of PsyGeNET, the information used to compute the EI has been validated by experts.
The EI is computed as follows:
EI = Npubs,+ / Npubs,total
EI = 1 indicates that all the publications support the GDA or the VDA, while EI < 1 indicates that there are publications that assert that there is no association between the gene/variants and the disease. If the gene/variant has no EI value, it indicates that the index has not been computed for this association.
where:
Npubs,+ is the number of publication supporting an association
Npubs,total is the total number of publications.

@jmillanacosta jmillanacosta changed the title DISGENET Evidence Index [TERM REQUEST] DISGENET Evidence Index Sep 16, 2024
@micheldumontier
Copy link
Collaborator

hi, this term is too specific for SIO.

@jmillanacosta
Copy link
Author

hi, this term is too specific for SIO.

Hi Michiel, understood, though the following classes represent similar DISGENET statistics:

@micheldumontier
Copy link
Collaborator

oh! i didn't remember about adding such a thing! hmm... but i think maybe this came from disgenet not wanting to maintain its own ontology. k, lemme have a think

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants