Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Frame rate issue #81

Open
hgdly opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Frame rate issue #81

hgdly opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@hgdly
Copy link

hgdly commented Jun 21, 2024

Hello,

I use the Livox SDK 2 with the Livox HAP Tx. I used the samples available on github to acquire point clouds. But it seems to me that the number of points I receive is much lower than the number of points per second indicated in the specs of the lidar hap. Is this normal? On livox viewer everything works fine. It's just that when I use the sdk, I get about 1000 points per second instead of the 452000 (or 425000 I don't remember) indicated in the specs.
How can I get more data ?

Thanks for your help.

@MaxiStocker
Copy link

Hi,

The same thing is happening for me. I would appreciate it if someone could answer this issue.

Thanks.

@MaxiStocker
Copy link

So, I have been in contact with the Livox support team, they seem to have forgotten about this repo. In their words: "Thank you for your reminder"

I did however get an answer out of them regarding the frame rate issue. This SDK does not use frames, opposed to other LIDARs, that let you process x points at once in a vectorised manner, the Livox SDK processes each point individually. Apperently, even with c code and a powerfull CPU, this results in a MUCH lower sample rate than advertised.

As far as I am concerned, this makes the SKD and the Livox Hap unusable.

@hgdly
Copy link
Author

hgdly commented Sep 10, 2024

Hi @MaxiStocker!
I've come up with a solution: store the result in binary, then make an additional program to translate the binary into text data.
Hope this helps!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants