New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SIO model isn't quite correct #1

Open

markwilkinson opened this issue Jun 12, 2019 · 0 comments

markwilkinson commented Jun 12, 2019

The use of SIO attributes isn't quite modelled correctly in these examples.

The correct model is:

P sio:has-attribute A
A sio:has-measurement-value MV
MV sio:has-value "blah blah"

So in these examples, the MV node is missing.

Cheers!

rajaram5 mentioned this issue

SIO model isn't quite correct ejp-rd-vp/CDE-semantic-model#2

Closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment