-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Behavioral and MEG sanity-check codeblock #279
Comments
Chime in with ideas and I'll keep the issue up to date (and hopefully implement for |
Would prefer recordings of spoken "left," "right," and "center" for Ross Maddox, Ph.D. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Eric Larson [email protected]
|
Then poll Yes/No if they actually came from left/center/right? |
Yep. Ross Maddox, Ph.D. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Eric Larson [email protected]
|
I am making those sounds now. Ross Maddox, Ph.D. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Ross Maddox [email protected] wrote:
|
Great, thanks. Any other checks you can think of that you've done before or might want going forward? |
Do we need an audio record check (at least get an acknowledgment somewhere that verbal response is being recorded) now that we have this for head/foot? Thanks for implementing these things… it’s probably good to make it available for the MEG center as well... Cheers Adrian KC Lee, ScD Phone: (206) 616-0102; Fax: (206) 221-6472 On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Eric Larson [email protected] wrote:
|
Good call, I'll add something sensible for a verbal response check. |
don't forget "blink three times" |
There are some things we should spend a couple of minutes testing in most experiments to save ourselves some pain. These can be optional by kwarg, but here are the ones I can think quickly:
[{1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3}] * 2
, for Ross's stuff it might be[{1: 'Yes', 2: 'No'}] * 2
.Anything else? cc @drammock @rkmaddox @akclee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: